Exped Dreamwalker Syn 133 Bag -Synthetic-
Currently Unavailable
Compare (0)
All Reviews
Show
Sort by
Filter by

Exped, Dreamwalker Syn 133 Sleeping bag review.

by Andrew Catbagan, from CA, United States Written on April 18, 2015
I love the design of the Dreamwalker sleeping bags. I have the 650 down bag and now the Syn 133 bag. The down bag is my winter bag and the Syn 133 is for spring summer fall bag. I recently tested the Syn 133 in the Eastern Sierras in Bridgeport, CA. With proper layering of clothing. I was able to stretch the comfort range into the low 30's, on an Exped Downmat Lite5 sleeping pad, no tent. Packing the sleeping bag into a Sea to Summit e-vent Sil compression dry stuff sack made for a very small and light package without any down feathers poking through the bag when compressed, like my Dreamwalker 650 down bag.
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No

Dreamwalker Syn great for backpacking

by DennisH, Written on May 5, 2014
I own both the Down and Syn versions of the OR/EXPED Dreamwalker (originally called Wallcreeper). These sleeping bag/parka combinations are excellent for lightweight backpacking. It is wonderful to get up on a cold morning and not have to get out of your sleeping bag. Also as an extra layer when its cold in camp. Enjoy!
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No

Nice Bag

by Bubba, from CA, United States Written on September 10, 2013
I'm a Big Man and it has plenty of room, It packs small and light wieght, It can serve as a coat if you get caught in a cold front so no need for a parka.
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
There are no reviews that match your criteria. Would you like to review this product?
Last updated 2025-11-12 UTC.