Reviews & Ratings for Exped Dreamwalker Syn 133 Bag -Synthetic- — 3 reviews

(3 reviews)
Exped Dreamwalker Syn 133 Bag -Synthetic-
Exped Dreamwalker Syn 133 Bag -Synthetic-
Currently Unavailable View Product
Write a Review
Compare (0)
1 item has been added
Add at least two items to compare
All Reviews
Show
Sort by
Filter by

Exped, Dreamwalker Syn 133 Sleeping bag review.

by Andrew Catbagan, from CA, United States Written on April 18, 2015
I love the design of the Dreamwalker sleeping bags. I have the 650 down bag and now the Syn 133 bag. The down bag is my winter bag and the Syn 133 is for spring summer fall bag. I recently tested the Syn 133 in the Eastern Sierras in Bridgeport, CA. With proper layering of clothing. I was able to stretch the comfort range into the low 30's, on an Exped Downmat Lite5 sleeping pad, no tent. Packing the sleeping bag into a Sea to Summit e-vent Sil compression dry stuff sack made for a very small and light package without any down feathers poking through the bag when compressed, like my Dreamwalker 650 down bag.
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share

Dreamwalker Syn great for backpacking

by DennisH, Written on May 5, 2014
I own both the Down and Syn versions of the OR/EXPED Dreamwalker (originally called Wallcreeper). These sleeping bag/parka combinations are excellent for lightweight backpacking. It is wonderful to get up on a cold morning and not have to get out of your sleeping bag. Also as an extra layer when its cold in camp. Enjoy!
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share

Nice Bag

by Bubba, from CA, United States Written on September 10, 2013
I'm a Big Man and it has plenty of room, It packs small and light wieght, It can serve as a coat if you get caught in a cold front so no need for a parka.
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share
There are no reviews that match your criteria. Would you like to review this product?