Reviews & Ratings for Mammut Stoney Pants - Mens — 8 reviews

(8 reviews)
Mammut Stoney Pants - Mens
Mammut Stoney Pants - Mens
Currently Unavailable View Product
Write a Review
Compare (0)
1 item has been added
Add at least two items to compare
Featured Reviews
Most Helpful Positive Review Excellent pants that FIT PROPERLY, great price
After deciding that it was time for a new pair of ski pants, I began to shop locally and try on a few different brands/styles. Apparently, because of my size (5'8", 145lbs, 31x31 pant size) and desire to find a pant that didn't have an absurdly baggy fit, my search became very difficult. I tried on ...
Read More...
Most Helpful Negative Review Stoney Pants
Size medium, short size. I'm 5'8" - waist fine, length not really a short, pant leg is baggy. More of a shell in regards to warmth.
All Reviews
Show
Sort by
Filter by

Good Quality - Baggy

by JORGE L., Verified Owner from NUEVO LEON, Mexico Written on December 17, 2015
Overall quality and looks are great, the only con is the fit is too baggy, read other reviews that said otherwise but for me the pants are baggy on the legs and super baggy on the boot area. I already own Mammut Splide pants which have nice slim fit but are only available in black so I was looking for the same fit just different color.
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share

Great Pants, If You Don't Mind the Liner Material

by Nick G, from OK, United States Written on July 21, 2015
I'm 6' 5", 225 lbs, and normally wear 36 x 36 jeans. I've always had a hard time finding ski pants long enough for me. I was pretty happy with the pair of Patagonia Snowshot pants (w/ 34" inseam) I had lengthened, but wanted to try something a bit less baggy that was long enough out of the box. So I bought a pair of Stoneys in 36 Long according to the size guide. Unfortunately, they were too tight through the hips and upper thighs, so I exchanged them for a pair of 38 Longs. The fit of the 38s was spot-on with just a bit of extra room to move. I really like the quality of the pants and the pocket placement, but I didn't like the microfleece liner material. Compared to all the other ski pants I've worn that use a slick nylon or polyester lining, these don't slide over my thermals as freely. The material hangs up and binds on my merino & poly long underwear, restricting movement. I flirted with the idea of keeping these and wearing slick-surface compression tights under them since I liked all other apspects of the pants so much, but the grabby liner material was a dealbreaker for me. I sent them back.
If you ski in warmer conditions without an insulating layer, or if you routinely use compression tights, these will probably work very well for you.
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share

Stoney pants 36 short

by THOMAS J., from CA, United States Written on April 4, 2015
these pants fit well and are warm and dry.
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share

Mammut Stoney Pants

by Kathleen L., from NJ, United States Written on December 14, 2014
Excellent construction, well fitting, and true to size
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share

Excellent pant!

by YI H., from HUNAN, China Written on December 11, 2014
Excellent pant! Warm and soft.
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share

Perfect fit for a tall guy

by K2 Denver, Written on May 5, 2014
My husband is a tall trim guy, 6'3" 190Lbs, so 6 years ago I bought him ski pants...the problem was to get them long enough they were too big. I finally couldn't stand it any more and went on the hunt for pants that actually fit him. I love a bargain and initially everything I found online was very expensive, then I came across Campsaver. I was able to order his size (waist and inseam)and at a v
Would recommend: Yes
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share
There are no reviews that match your criteria. Would you like to review this product?